CyberspaceAfterCap Propos 120103 - Updated!
Draft propositions for the Cyberspace Panel, Life after Capitalism Programme, World Social Forum, Porto Alegre, January 23-8, 2003
Email:
watermanantenna.nl
Global Solidarity Dialogue Website (inactive):
www.antenna.nl/~waterman/
Global Solidarity Dialogue Group (less inactive):
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GloSoDia
The point here is to confront the new international mouvement social, still bearing certain features of the old national-industrial capitalism, with the relational principle proper to the epoch of a globalized, informatised, finance and services capitalism.
Networking existed long before the internet and long before capitalism. It is the form of inter-relation within face-to-face communities, particularly where no developed state or market exists. However, computerization, the internet, cyberspace, now makes it possible (not inevitable) for state and market to be challenged, and to develop world-scale networking based on internationalist principles.
The historical labour movement (now largely reduced to a trade union form in profound crisis) has long taken organizational/institutional shape, with the consequent loss of most movement characteristics, these notably including its early internationalism. 1
The newest international mouvement social, the 'anti-globalisation', 'anti-capitalist', or 'global justice and solidarity movement' (GJ&SM) has, like the radical-democratic international women's, ecological, indigenous and other such movements, been increasingly marked by the network form. This does not, however, mean that networking is understood in the same way, nor that the privileged space for such - cyberspace - is fully understood, nor its potential extensively and evenly developed.
The propositions below are clearly intended to suggest that the relational principle of networking is the one appropriate to social movements today, particularly in so far as they are concerned with an international/ist challenge and alternative to capitalist globalisation. They also suggest that cyberspace is the privileged one for human social emancipation. This privilege, however, comes only at the price of obligations: to the local/locale; to the marginalized; to the public sphere, to a constant critical self-examination.
It will be noted that I here concentrate on 'networking' and 'cyberspace', therefore failing to give the required attention to exciting new technical developments and multi-media applications that dramatically broaden the publicly-available means of cultural production, simultaneously lowering the entry qualifications. I rely here on others to make good this yawning gap.
The point is not to establish truths or truisms. It is to provoke discussion - particularly within and around the GJ&SM itself.
The matter of networking/cyberspace/culture is becoming critical with the World Social Forum and the 'social forum movement' internationally. In the period leading up to WSF3, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2003, two quite basic documents are under discussion:
The first discussion has been largely addressed to the IOC itself, although it is on a freely accessible website. The second was announced at the European Social Forum, Florence, November, 2002, with a draft being circulated on the Web in December 2002.
These two discussions, one on the internal structure/process, one on its most activist projection, will, in their process and outcome (rather than form and content) reveal the manner and extent to which the GJ&SM understands the new logic of networking, the nature of cyberspace, the increasing centrality of culture for human emancipation.
1. These propositions have their origins in an unpublished paper on international labour networking, as may become apparent. There will be an article version of this current paper, with relevant quotations and an extensive resource list.
hubproject.org – eur@action hub – autonomos space – www.agp.org